NZIBF’s submission to MFAT on the New Zealand UAE Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement Negotiations.
APEC Policy Partnership on Food Security (PPFS) Remarks to the High Level Conference on Key Issues, Beijing, 14 August 2014 Graeme Harrison, KNZM Chair, ANZCO Foods/New Zealand International Business Forum
FOOD STANDARDS AND SAFETY MANAGEMENT
Slide 1
It’s a pleasure to be in Beijing and to participate in this High Level Conference for PPFS.
I congratulate our Chairman, Dr Han, and thank all those involved in making the excellent arrangements for our meeting.
Coming from New Zealand, and representing the meat industry as I do, I know you will expect me to emphasise the importance of trade and open markets for achieving food security.
Well today I won’t disappoint you!
Slide 2
The need to make more rapid and meaningful progress towards achieving food security is at the heart of the PPFS mandate.
The FAO has estimated that global food demand will increase significantly in the next 35 years.
The extent of this growth in demand, and its implications for governments, is such that it is likely to challenge existing policy and regulatory settings.
This also means that taking action to achieve food security is not something that can be put off until 2020 ? this progress needs to start today ? but the 2020 deadline is instructive.
It aligns with the Bogor goals for free and open trade and investment in the region.
The Bogor goals are in turn closely connected with the vision for regional economic integration which has guided APEC’s work since the beginning.
Simply put, we can’t achieve this integration without food security.
In other words if we have persistent food insecurity, if economies then resort to trade protectionism in order to combat its ills and feed their people, then we will not make progress towards the sort of inter-dependent economic future that the founders of APEC have put before us.
Open trade and food security are mutually reinforcing.
Slide 3
My own company, Anzco Foods, is committed to ensuring the orderly supply of safe, nutritious, sustainably produced meat products, particularly beef and lamb, to consumers in Asia Pacific markets.
Working with our farmer suppliers in New Zealand, local and foreign regulatory agencies and our network of business partners in the market, we have built a reputation for quality and safety which provides assurances for importers, distributors and consumers.
We recognise the fundamental importance of ensuring people have confidence in the food they eat and that local agricultural systems are also protected.
Open markets need to be accompanied by strong regulatory oversight of trade.
Slide 4
This balance is reflected in the World Trade Organisation’s Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement, which speaks of the need to facilitate trade while protecting human, plant and animal health.
In New Zealand we recognise that our reputation stands or falls on the integrity of our country’s bio-security and animal production systems.
The responsibility for maintaining this reputation lies with the New Zealand Government in making sure the systems and assurances are robust and with the private sector throughout the supply chain ? right through to the consumer.
We in the private sector work closely with government agencies, especially the Ministry for Primary Industries, and with our local science and research organisations, to develop a world-class safety assurance regime.
These agencies in turn work closely with their counterparts in the market to build confidence in our systems and to be able to address very quickly any problems which arise.
Unfortunately there is a tendency for some economies to take a stricter approach to imports than to domestic production.
There is also a tendency to regard the commercial interests of exporting economies as somehow different to the importing economies’ food security needs.
In fact, once again, both are inextricably linked.
Exporters cannot sell products to consumers who have no confidence in what they buy.
Exporters can also be easily deterred if the cost of trading with another economy becomes too high.
This can create food shortages and increase costs.
It can reduce manufacturing capacity in importing economies and increase unemployment.
While policies and processes aimed at limiting imports are often intended to promote domestic production to enhance food security, they invariably have the reverse effect.
The better approach is to approve the exporting economy’s own compliance systems, and audit the overarching regulatory system.
If you can trust an economy’s systems you do not need to check every last container.
Compliance efforts can focus on those economies whose systems need to be further developed.
This allows smoother, safer trade across the region and hence improves food security and food safety.
We recognise that building trust requires sustained and collaborative effort.
There is a role for PPFS to contribute to building trust through exchanging information, and providing capacity building to develop robust production and trade systems.
New Zealand’s own experience of developing a world-class food safety assurance regime is one that is very relevant for a number of economies represented here today.
Over time we have moved comprehensively to adopt an innovative, science based approach to food safety, one based on outcomes, rather than prescription, one that reflects international standard-making through Codex and one that relies on developing a partnership approach with regulatory agencies.
New Zealand’s food safety system is based on a very simple premise: the Government sets the standards it expects food companies to meet; and, within reason, each company is allowed to develop its own processes to meet those standards.
Penalties for failure to meet those prescribed standards are heavy ? in both a regulatory and commercial sense.
Companies are continually audited by independent verification agencies to ensure that they are reaching the targets prescribed in law.
Developing strong systems and ensuring that these systems are tested rigorously, independently and efficiently ? we believe this is the best way to meet the closely inter-related goals of open trade, food security and food safety.
Slide 5
As I said at the outset, we are meeting here in Beijing at a time when the global demand for food is continuing to increase steadily.
The FAO and World Bank both estimate that only 10 percent of this new demand can be met by new cropland.
Only 20 percent of demand can be met from better use of existing cropland using existing technology.
It follows that 70 percent must come from new technology and from policy innovation.
The task before us in PPFS is to find the answers both in terms of technology and policy.
Doing what we have always done is not going to meet the ambitious aims of the PPFS Roadmap towards Food Security by 2020.
We need more innovation in our policy responses.
Our approach to food safety must continue to evolve.
The future of our entire region depends on it.
Slide 6
REGISTER WITH TRADE WORKS
Register to stay up to date with latest news, as well as saving and discussing articles you’re interested in.
Latest News
SUBMISSION TO THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE – APRIL 2024
NEW ZEALAND-UAE COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT NEGOTIATIONS This submission is made on behalf of the New Zealand International Business Forum (NZIBF), whose members are listed at Annex A[1]. NZIBF is a forum of senior business leaders working together...
NEW TEAM FOR AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND LEADERSHIP FORUM
Media release, 2 April 2024 The New Zealand Co-Chair of the Australia New Zealand Leadership Forum (ANZLF), Greg Lowe, welcomes the appointment of Stephen Jacobi and Simon Le Quesne to the New Zealand arm of the ANZLF Secretariat. The ANZLF brings business leaders,...
NZ/EU FTA A BONUS FOR SOME SECTORS – BUSINESS FORUM
Media release, 22 March 2024 The NZ International Business Forum (NZIBF) acknowledges the passage of the implementing legislation for the New Zealand/European Union Free Trade Agreement and looks forward to the FTA’s entry into force on 1 May. “This agreement was...
“MEAGRE OUTCOME” FROM WTO IN ABU DHABI – BUSINESS FORUM
Media release, 2 March 2024 Despite its overwhelming importance at the heart of the international trade system, members of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) have concluded their Ministerial in Abu Dhabi (“MC13”) with only a meagre outcome. NZ International Business...
To go or woe with the WTO?
We’ve been here before with the World Trade Organisation (WTO). The global trade body’s 13th Ministerial meeting (“MC13”) opens in Abu Dhabi on Monday 26 February, with Trade Minister McClay serving as Vice-Chair. In recent weeks diplomats, trade...
DCANZ – Agricultural Subsidy Distortions Must Be Addressed
23 February 2024 - Media Release by the Dairy Companies Association of New Zealand (DCANZ) As the world’s Trade Ministers head to a WTO meeting in Abu Dhabi, the Dairy Companies Association of New Zealand (DCANZ) is calling for an immediate capping of agricultural...
Asia-Pacific business leaders call for greater economic dynamism with people at the center of the APEC agenda
16 February 2024 - APEC NEWS RELEASE Issued by The APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC) The APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC), meeting this week in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, expressed deep concerns about the growing pressures of economic fragmentation and the risks...
SUBMISSION TO THE PARLIAMENTARY FOREIGN AFFAIRS, DEFENCE AND TRADE COMMITTEE – FEBRUARY 2024
NEW ZEALAND EUROPEAN UNION FREE TRADE AGREEMENT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL Introduction and Summary This submission is made on behalf of the New Zealand International Business Forum (NZIBF) and Export NZ. NZIBF is a forum of senior business leaders working...
ABAC Statement on WTO MC13 – February 2024
Now, more than ever, the world needs a credible, relevant, and effective multilateral trading system, with the World Trade Organization (WTO) at its core. In this era of global challenges, the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC) recognizes that the WTO is...
Global Industry Statement on the WTO Moratorium on Customs Duties on Electronic Transmissions
NZIBF has joined 170 international business associations in calling for an extension to the current moratorium on tariffs applying to digital services (like Netflix) at the forthcoming WTO Ministerial meeting. The undersigned associations urge WTO members to support...
Resilient supply chains: Yesterday, today and tomorrow
Published by the Hinrich Foundation, Singapore, 23 August 2024 By Stephen Jacobi History has much to teach us about the way trade contributes to prosperity through the movement of goods, services, people, and ideas. Today, data can be added to this web of...
SUBMISSION TO THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE
GENERAL REVIEW OF THE COMPREHENSIVE AND PROGRESSIVE AGREEMENT FOR TRANS- PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP (CPTPP) DECEMBER 2023 Summary This submission is made on behalf of the New Zealand International Business Forum (NZIBF). As individual NZIBF Members may make their own...
Todd McClay – your trade mission, should you choose to accept it …
As published by Newsroom 19 December 2023 By Stephen Jacobi “Twas the week before Christmas, When all through the house Not a creature was stirring, Except busy trade officials … ‘Tis the season to be “BiM-ing”* and the NZ International Business Forum has sent its...
2023 – Steps forward and back
Trade liberalisation moved forward and backward in 2023. Some notable gains have been achieved for New Zealand, but war, geo-political rivalry and global inflation continue to depress global markets. While the pandemic continued to lurk in the shadows, 2023 was the...
NZIBF releases Brief to the Incoming Minister of Trade
DECEMBER 2023...