Trade debate takes off in US – and NZ!

by | May 2, 2015 | Uncategorized

Remove

On a rare day in Washington recently it looked as though the Congress and Administration could finally agree on something. Congressional leaders from both sides released for discussion a draft ‘fast track’ trade bill to authorise the President to conduct and complete trade negotiations including TPP. Subsequent wrangling revealed the limits of bipartisanship as the President fought hard to convince fellow Democrats and the Republican leadership sought to placate Tea Party protectionists. The debate was as much about the roles and responsibilities of legislative and executive branches as trade itself. It revealed however an extraordinary scepticism, if not downright hostility, about the effects of trade on the US economy. Offshoring and job losses are routinely raised while little attention is paid to increasing productivity at a time of economic downturn – this essentially means American workers are producing more with less but there is less demand. What to do if not trade more, ie grow demand for American goods worldwide by reducing costs and increasing efficiency in supply consumers’ needs. That debate continues as the renamed ‘Trade Promotion Accountability” bill makes its way through Congress as an essential pre-requisite for concluding TPP.

Trade is also increasingly under scrutiny in NZ as TPP gathers momentum and the NZ Korea FTA is debated by the Parliamentary Select Committee (so much for the accusation that these things are done in secret!). The Korea FTA is not a perfect agreement (some tariffs will remain even after a lengthy implementation period) but it was important to be concluded to ensure NZ was not discriminated against in the Korean market where a number of competitors already have FTAs. The public debate is more about the investment provisions of the FTA, which are seen as a stalking horse for TPP.  In fact the Korea FTA goes further than previous FTAs in maintaining a balance between investor protection and the right to regulate. There is little risk to NZ from this agreement.

This post was prepared by Stephen Jacobi, Executive Director of the NZ International Business Forum www.nzibf.co.nz

REGISTER WITH TRADE WORKS

Register to stay up to date with latest news, as well as saving and discussing articles you’re interested in.

 

Remove

 

Latest News

NEW TEAM FOR AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND LEADERSHIP FORUM

Media release, 2 April 2024 The New Zealand Co-Chair of the Australia New Zealand Leadership Forum (ANZLF), Greg Lowe, welcomes the appointment of Stephen Jacobi and Simon Le Quesne to the New Zealand arm of the ANZLF Secretariat. The ANZLF brings business leaders,...

To go or woe with the WTO?

We’ve been here before with the World Trade Organisation (WTO).   The global trade body’s 13th Ministerial meeting (“MC13”) opens in Abu Dhabi on Monday 26 February, with Trade Minister McClay serving as Vice-Chair.  In recent weeks diplomats, trade...

SUBMISSION TO THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE

GENERAL REVIEW OF THE COMPREHENSIVE AND PROGRESSIVE AGREEMENT FOR TRANS- PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP (CPTPP) DECEMBER 2023 Summary This submission is made on behalf of the New Zealand International Business Forum (NZIBF). As individual NZIBF Members may make their own...

2023 – Steps forward and back

Trade liberalisation moved forward and backward in 2023.  Some notable gains have been achieved for New Zealand, but war, geo-political rivalry and global inflation continue to depress global markets. While the pandemic continued to lurk in the shadows, 2023 was the...