Guest Post: Is TPP dead – or not?

by | Dec 19, 2016 | Trade Working Blog | 0 comments

Remove

Guest post from Tracey Epps, Trade Law Consultant, Chapman Tripp.

free-thinkingTPP provides that the Agreement cannot enter into force without the US. But before we declare TPP dead, we should recall that there is no time limit to prevent the other 11 signatories from continuing to press the US to change its position.

Unfortunately, this is not without risk for New Zealand. We don’t know if or when the US might change its position, and whether in doing so it might insist on “fixes” to the Agreement. And of course, while we wait, other countries could make bilateral deals (such as Australia has already done with Japan) that give them market access advantages over us.

Another option is for the other 11 signatories to go ahead without the US. While not ideal, this would still have benefits for New Zealand exporters, especially in those countries with which we do not have FTAs. And surely, at some point in time, the US would want to join in. This option would require strong political will among the 11, which is no sure thing. Japanese Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe, has stated that TPP without the US “has no meaning” and that the fundamental balance of interests would be disturbed. This is a fair point – the entry into force provision reads the way it does because the other 11 wanted US participation. But circumstances do change, and it may be worth trying to salvage what we can, despite earlier intentions.

Assuming political will among the 11, a new agreement (TPP 2.0) would be required with, at minimum, a revised entry into force clause. Provisions specific to the US, such as its market access schedule, could either be removed or remain (although they would have no legal effect in the absence of the US).

The key uncertainty in this scenario is whether the remaining 11 would want to renegotiate the Agreement. Those that made concessions in return for access to the lucrative US market may well wish to do so. But aside from the time and resources involved, renegotiation would risk unravelling hard-fought benefits obtained, and may reduce the likelihood of the US returning to the fold.

A simpler approach could be for the 11 to agree not to enforce some of the more controversial (i.e. US –driven) provisions until such time as agreed otherwise. This could go some way towards addressing concerns about concessions made and would preserve TPP’s attractiveness to the US.

If the remaining 11 were to find the political will to move forward with TPP version 2.0, the US could, at a later stage, like any other country, submit a request to accede to the Agreement. A working group would then be formed to negotiate terms and conditions for the accession. Whether this would leave the door open for the US to tweak the Agreement would remain to be seen.

This is an abridged version of an op ed that appeared in the print edition of the National Business Review on 9 December 2016.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

REGISTER WITH TRADE WORKS

Register to stay up to date with latest news, as well as saving and discussing articles you’re interested in.

 

Remove

 

Latest News

LAMENTATION DAY

When President Trump spoke in the White House Rose Garden to launch his wrecking-ball “fair and reciprocal tariffs”, there were some in the audience wearing hard hats.  While this was doubtless to show support for the move amongst hard-working Americans, maybe...

BUSINESS FORUM WELCOMES INDIA FTA NEGOTIATIONS

Media release, 17 March 2025 The NZ International Business Forum (NZIBF) welcomes the launch of free trade negotiations with India, announced in Delhi, and is particularly pleased that these will proceed on a comprehensive basis. “There is enormous value to be gained...

Playing the long trade game with India

Prime Minister Luxon is at last making his visit to India with a large business and community delegation.  We wish them well in expanding and deepening the relationship with India.  The reasons for doing so we have explained previously. Our Government’s...

SUBMISSION TO THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE

PROPOSED GREEN ECONOMY JOINT WORKING GROUP WITH CHILE AND SINGAPORE MARCH 2025 Introduction This submission is made on behalf of the New Zealand International Business Forum (NZIBF), whose members are listed at Annex A[1]. NZIBF is a forum of senior business leaders...

SOUTHERN LINK REVISITED SEMINAR, SEPT 2024

On 24 September 2024 a stakeholders seminar was held in Auckland to reassess the Southern Link concept, five years after a large conference kickstarted focused discussion of the idea (before Covid intervened).   This report of the seminar discussions...

T Day has come

STOP PRESS – NOT SO FAST.  This post deals with the tariffs President Trump announced on 1 February he would impose on Canada, Mexico and China.  By 4 February he announced imposition of tariffs on Canada and Mexico would be suspended for 30 days (until 5 March). ...

Back to the future?

The end of 2024 has trade advocates reaching back to their 2016 taking points as an Administration of a depressingly protectionist hue prepares to take office in the United States, once the global champion for trade liberalisation.  We do not know for now what,...