Guest post: O Canada! Talking trade in Toronto

by | Aug 4, 2017 | Trade Working Blog


Guest post from Phil O’Reilly, member of ABAC New Zealand and Managing Director of Iron Duke Partners

These are testing times for trade liberalisation. There has been a lot of talk over the last year about the rise of protectionism and the risks of an all-out trade war.   Whether this actually manifests in significant concrete action remains to be seen – but what should worry us is how hard it is to shift the dial on the public debate on trade. We cannot afford to be disengaged from this: our communities (and the most vulnerable groups in them) will be the losers if we see the erosion of a fifty-year consensus towards more open markets and freeing up flows of trade, investment and people.

 I was in Toronto last week for a meeting of the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC), along with fellow senior business leaders from around the Asia-Pacific region. We spent a lot of time talking about how we can best support APEC Leaders to press ahead with the hard yards of trade liberalisation and keep the faith with our overarching vision for regional economic integration. The trade liberalisation goal does not seem to be perceived by everyone in the region as the clear imperative that it used to be. The rhetoric that has emerged in the last year in some quarters has swung worryingly in the other direction, with (admittedly boilerplate) statements about resisting protectionism being very deliberately removed from various international declarations, for example those from the G7, G20 and even APEC Trade Ministers.   Despite some worrying trends in the messaging, the talk has not – so far – resulted in significant concrete action to raise trade barriers, beyond the ongoing blight of non-tariff barriers (which are of course highly prevalent in food, agriculture, manufacturing and services trade – although even there we have seen some signs of the largest economies stepping back somewhat from resorting to such measures in the last few months). But should the first few dominoes fall, it will become all too easy for governments to respond to special pleading by various domestic interest groups for new subsidies, raised tariffs, onerous regulatory requirements or curbs on the movement of skilled workers.

Should that concern us?   The view of the Asia-Pacific business is a resounding “yes”.   Trade and all that goes along with it has lifted millions out of poverty in our region – people today live indisputably better lives than previous generations. That is not to say we have got it completely right: governments still have a big task in ensuring that they have appropriate policies in place to allow workers, small business and wider communities to adjust as painlessly as possible to the rapidly-evolving economic environment, not least as the wave of digital transformation sweeps over us. But pressing ahead with regional economic integration, and avoiding a downwards spiral of tit-for-tat trade barriers, is critically important for the sustained prosperity of our region – not just for big corporates, but for small firms and smallholder farmers, for women entrepreneurs and our communities overall. It could be said that we have collectively dropped the ball in making the case to the public for more open trade, and in ensuring that we truly achieve “inclusive growth”. Business and governments have different but complementary roles when it comes to explaining trade and globalisation. Government has the key role, and the overall responsibility for communities, adjustment policies, welfare and all the rest. But business also has a role to explain trade to its stakeholders including employees, suppliers, customers and the communities that business serves. The ABAC view is that business needs to stay engaged, along with political leaders, to communicate more clearly about how trade can and should work for everyone.

Phil O’Reilly


Register to stay up to date with latest news, as well as saving and discussing articles you’re interested in.

Latest News


Perhaps a cyclone was after all a fitting backdrop for the meeting of the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC) which was held in Auckland on 12-14 February – the global environment against which the meeting took place is decidedly stormy.  In the event the wind...


As I write this end of year dispatch, NZIBF is preparing to host the first meeting for 2023 of the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC).  We are looking forward to welcoming the 200 or so business leaders and senior officials from APEC member economies across the...

NZ Herald: Time to lift our game in India

Following his recent visit to India our Executive Director Stephen Jacobi penned this article advocating a more strategic approach to the further development of the relationship. The article was published by the NZ Herald on 9 December.

APEC Rolls out Priorities for 2023

Issued by the Informal Senior Officials’ Meeting - Honolulu, The United States, 13 December 2022 Aiming to provide tailwinds for member economies to strengthen recovery and resilience, as well as advance broad-based economic growth, the United States rolled out its...

NZIBF 2022 Chair Report

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING 2022 CHAIR’S REPORT I am pleased to present my second report on the activities and achievements of the NZ International Business Forum (NZIBF) for 2022-23, our fifteenth year of operations.  At the outset I would like to thank Members for...


New Zealand business will be represented at the APEC Leaders’ Week in Bangkok, commencing 13 November, by members of the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC). New Zealand’s three members – Rachel Taulelei, Malcolm Johns and Anna Curzon – supported by Stephen Jacobi...

Submission to MFAT for CPTPP Review

30 September 2022 Phil Mellor Economic Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Wellington (By email) Dear Phil, Thank you for your email of 1 September, seeking our comments on the three year review of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans...