Non tariff barriers – a new frontier for trade policy.

by | Mar 21, 2016 | Trade Working Blog, Uncategorized

Remove

A recent report from the forest industry[1] has drawn attention to the increasing prevalence of non tariff barriers (NTBs).

NTBs are the next frontier for trade policy.  As tariffs are brought down through comprehensive trade agreements, governments tend to make greater use of non tariff measures (NTMs).

NTMs and NTBs are not the same thing.  NTMs can be instituted for a range of public policy reasons – to protect human health, the environment or biosecurity.  NTMs only become NTBs when they are more trade restrictive than necessary.

Some governments use NTMs/NTBs for protectionist reasons.  When the measures apply only to imported products, or differentiate between trading partner, you can be fairly sure something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

Other NTBs are notoriously difficult to identify and even more to address.  Compulsory standards, often not based on international norms or legitimate science; technical regulations requiring amendments to the way products are manufactured; testing regimes which require labyrinthine procedures; product approvals requiring inspection of individual premises – all these are examples of NTBs which frustrate New Zealand exports.

The forest industry is by no means alone in this.  The food industry faces a large number of NTBs given that it deals with perishable products, traded across long supply chains. Manufacturing is also highly affected.

Other countries occasionally accuse New Zealand of maintaining NTBs.  Our strict biosecurity regulations, applied for good reason, are often cited.  Our regulations prohibiting the commercialisation of trout are less easily able to be defended.

What can be done about NTBs?  Trade agreements like TPP seek to put in place new disciplines around the way regulations are made and thus restrict the scope of NTMs.  The ability for trading partners to express their views on proposed measures before they are implemented is a case in point. That’s why the Government is saying that the greater benefit from TPP will come from addressing NTBs rather than reducing tariffs.

It’s also important for business to work closely with the Government to identify these NTBs.  That’s why the work of the forest industry is welcome.  Another example is the annual report published by the horticulture industry[2].

On the new frontier of trade policy we need all players to lend their shoulder to the wheel.

This post was prepared by Stephen Jacobi, Executive Director of the NZ International Business Forum.

REGISTER WITH TRADE WORKS

Register to stay up to date with latest news, as well as saving and discussing articles you’re interested in.

Latest News

Remarks to ASEAN Business Council Webinar, 26 April 2023

REMARKS TO ASEAN NZ BUSINESS COUNCIL WEBINAR, 26 APRIL 2023 STEPHEN JACOBI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WHEN ELEPHANTS FIGHT - US/CHINA TENSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ASEAN It’s great to join this webinar with my good friend Siah Hwee Ang. Thanks to the ASEAN NZ Business...

AMIDST THE STORM: ABAC MEETS IN AUCKLAND

Perhaps a cyclone was after all a fitting backdrop for the meeting of the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC) which was held in Auckland on 12-14 February – the global environment against which the meeting took place is decidedly stormy.  In the event the wind...

A YEAR FOR RECONNECTING

As I write this end of year dispatch, NZIBF is preparing to host the first meeting for 2023 of the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC).  We are looking forward to welcoming the 200 or so business leaders and senior officials from APEC member economies across the...

NZ Herald: Time to lift our game in India

Following his recent visit to India our Executive Director Stephen Jacobi penned this article advocating a more strategic approach to the further development of the relationship. The article was published by the NZ Herald on 9 December.