April 2025 Introduction This submission is being made on behalf of the New Zealand International Business Forum (NZIBF), whose members are listed at...
Speech to the CER-ASEAN Integration Partnership Forum, 31 May 2017

REMARKS TO THE CER-ASEAN INTEGRATION PARTNERSHIP FORUM
31 MAY 2017
STEPHANIE HONEY, ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, NZIBF
Economic Integration in Challenging Times: The Business Perspective
This year is the 200th anniversary of the discovery of the principle of ‘comparative advantage’ by an economist called David Ricardo. As I’m sure you all know, comparative advantage explains why you are always better off trading with your neighbours than not trading. To put it another way, 200 years ago Ricardo was the first cheerleader for free trade.
My name is Stephanie Honey, and I’m here today as a cheerleader for the modern version of trade – regional economic integration.
I have been where you are sitting. For nearly two decades I was an official at the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, developing policy and negotiating with other countries’ officials. These days, I work with some of the largest internationally-oriented New Zealand firms, developing policy and advocating for trade liberalization. I also run a small business providing advice on trade policy and strategy, and offering trade policy education, to governments and the private sector in New Zealand and other countries.
Twenty or thirty years ago, someone like me would not have been on a podium talking to a room full of officials. Trade was the purview of governments, and no-one else. Delegations were full of civil servants, and not they people they served. But the world has changed, and trade has changed. So has the role that business can, and should, play in the trade agenda.
Today, I have two important messages for you: first, that economic integration helps businesses to build resilience and find opportunities – even in challenging times. And second, that business is an important partner for governments in driving ahead with, and cheering for, economic integration – especially in challenging times.
Let me talk for a few minutes about the different challenges we are facing.
We are seeing signs of a retreat from globalization. We are seeing the rise of populist politics, Trump, and Brexit, and fears about immigrants.
We are seeing new protectionist trade barriers being thrown up, and the rejection of the WTO, TPP and other mega-regional trade deals. The Governor of New Zealand’s Reserve Bank has identified rising protectionism in the international trading environment as the single biggest threat to New Zealand’s prosperity. Last year trade growth sank to some of the lowest levels of the last 50 years. It has risen a little this year, but the global economy remains weak and volatile after the Global Financial Crisis.
We are seeing disruptive technologies, where manufacturing jobs are being replaced by robots. The way that our parents’ generation made and bought and sold things is being turned on its head. We are seeing the challenges of climate change, and rapid, chaotic urbanization.
Challenging times indeed!
But the business of business is to solve problems, including challenges like these ones. And the business of governments is to create the right enabling environment for firms to find those solutions, and survive, and prosper.
Where does CER fit into this story? In many ways, CER itself has been the product of challenging times. When CER was first negotiated, New Zealand was in an economic crisis. Our major trading partner, the UK, had joined the ‘Fortress Europe’ a decade before, severely limiting our biggest export market. New Zealand’s own protectionist policies had driven our economy to near-paralysis. What could we do?
CER gave us vital impetus to help the economy out of the doldrums. As tariffs came down, firms could source inputs more cheaply so that they could export more efficiently. They were exposed to new ideas about how to operate. Thanks to new competition, they were forced to become more responsive to the market and to consumers.
Again, in the early 2000s, when Australia and New Zealand decided to press ahead with the visionary Single Economic Market concept, New Zealand and Australia were facing the challenge of a flood of FTAs negotiated by our trading partners, and a strong emerging Asian regionalism. Being almost invisible in any global view of the world is a huge challenge. What was our future going to be in that ferociously competitive environment? The answer lay in the Single Economic Market.
Born out of challenging times, CER has also helped business to build resilience and stay strong in challenging times. New Zealand firms are only too aware that they come from a small and geographically isolated base. Clearly global markets are where our fortunes lie. But global markets can be an intimidating place for small businesses. Exporting and offshore investment are risky, and costly.
For small businesses, Australia is a perfect testing-ground and launching pad to broader opportunities. It offers predictable rules, and a streamlined regulatory environment which is very similar, and often identical, to New Zealand’s. That lowers costs, and allows us to trade with confidence – nobody is going to change the rules on us or hold products up at the border on a whim.
For larger firms, too, the Single Economic Market has provided a solid starting point for being more outward-looking. It has been a vital source of investment, to make up for the lack of domestic capital, in addition to better, cheaper and high-quality inputs of goods and services. It has also been a powerful driver of domestic economic and policy reforms. New Zealand’s and Australia’s own regulatory structures are more streamlined, more focused on delivering high-quality and fit-for-purpose outcomes and more robust, thanks to regulatory competition and shared learning about best practice. Businesses have been obliged to become more productive and more nimble. That has ensured that New Zealand firms are ready to compete and succeed around the world.
The Single Economic Market also recognises that trade has changed – it’s not your grandfather’s or even your father’s trade any more. The modern model of trade is one where supply chains and value chains are closely integrated across multiple geographies, and where trade is not just about goods, but also about services and investment, and about the rules that apply behind borders including standards and other regulatory requirements.
In the Single Economic Market, skilled workers, and flows of capital, and value-adding production processes involving both goods and services, can move easily backwards and forwards across the Tasman and out to the world. All of this means that New Zealand business is smarter, more competitive and more resilient than it otherwise would have been.
It is rare to find a New Zealand business that hasn’t benefited in some way from Australian inputs, cross-fertilisation of Australian ideas or people, or capital investment, not to mention greater scale and scope arising from the single market.
And it’s not just one-way traffic. 17,000 Australian firms export to New Zealand, compared to around 9,000 exporting to the US and 5,000 to China. New Zealand boosts the Australian economic mass by around one-fifth.
I talked before about resilience. Australia’s and New Zealand’s GDP growth have consistently been stronger than the OECD average. Australia and New Zealand were able to weather the global financial crisis far better than many others in the developed world.
But I am not here to blindly praise CER. The Single Economic Market isn’t perfect.
There is still work to do to improve some policies that help create distortions in the Single Economic Market, for example in relation to tax policies and reducing behind-the-border regulatory barriers to services trade. The most ambitious and visionary forms of integration – currency, political union, central banks – are unlikely to be realised. And sadly, recently there have been signs of unpicking some longstanding integration frameworks around people movement.
However, the biggest benefit from SEM economic integration isn’t across the Tasman. It is from CER outwards to the world. You could argue that AANZFTA is the poster child for what closer economic integration between Australia and New Zealand can achieve – two sovereign nations negotiating as one with other countries. Later, we were able to take the approaches on regulatory coordination and coherence that we developed in the SEM into the TPP Agreement. Even today, New Zealand and Australia are both strongly advocating for an ambitious market access outcome in RCEP, a negotiation which of course ASEAN leads.
So has business always been a cheerleader for CER? Business was reluctant to embrace CER at first, especially in sectors sheltered behind high tariffs, subsidies and regulatory barriers. On the New Zealand side, like David facing Goliath, there was also the existential fear of a larger partner. The New Zealand business community was fearful of the risk of the “hollowing out” of our economy. It must be recognised that New Zealand faces challenges in attracting and retaining skilled people, firms and investment. However, given the natural tendency for skills, capital and head offices to move away from the periphery and towards the centre, and so closer to major consumer markets, this process would undoubtedly be happening anyway – and in fact, the extra competitive edge that the SEM gives New Zealand businesses helps in enhancing our “value proposition” for an increasingly mobile workforce and investors. Again – in challenging times, economic integration with Australia has stood us in good stead.
Over time the benefits of the single market became more obvious to business. Firms recognized that they needed to be able to compete internationally and CER could help them to do that. The business community gradually become more enthusiastic, and began to engage more in the CER process. These days I think you would struggle to find a business on either side of the Tasman that does not strongly support closer economic integration.
But business can be frustrated at the slow progress and caution at the political level. The speed of decision-making and action in business are often significantly out of step with that of policy-makers.
Business actively seeks to influence and shape both governments’ agendas for the Single Economic Market, and keep the pressure on for progress. The incubator of good ideas for the SEM is not just confined to governments – business, academics and commentators all have views, and are encouraged to share them. In that, we are helped with some robust architecture.
In the early 2000s, action on the Single Market Agenda ramped up considerably with the aim of creating a “seamless business environment”. In parallel with that, new mechanisms were established, including the Australia New Zealand Leadership Forum in 2004. The Forum provides an opportunity for senior business and political leaders, along with academics and political commentators, to talk about what is working, and what still needs work. It gives a chance for governments to hear what their business people think, and for the business community to shape the future policy direction.
Governments have recognized that they need to engage with business to understand its needs as they develop policy – especially as the issues they are looking at become more complex and potentially affect domestic constituencies more deeply.
Thanks to the Leadership Forum, the Australian and New Zealand business community have become increasingly aligned and a new kind of governance of the economic relationship is emerging. Recently, the business communities on both sides of the Tasman have developed a common set of priorities to share with political leaders, including pursuing greater trans-Tasman collaboration on infrastructure, tourism, health technologies, innovation and non-tariff barriers. But our biggest focus is on shared opportunities in third markets, especially in the face of globally disruptive forces.
Because of the resilience and strength that CER has given us, we are ready to take on the world. Even in challenging times, we can reframe “problems” to find solutions. Instead of economic crisis, protectionism and disruptive technologies, we see before us dynamic markets, an Asia-Pacific “open for business”, and fantastic innovative products, new business models and better, quicker ways to meet consumer needs. To put it another way, challenging times offer uncertainty and risk, but also opportunity.
But the role of business must go beyond simply trying to shape the agenda and to exploit the opportunities that it offers. Business also needs to help to “sell” the benefits.
It has become something of a cliché that globally we need a more compelling narrative on trade. We also need a broader recognition by governments, and policy-makers, and communities that more open markets are not enough – we also need solid macroeconomic settings and complementary and well-designed social policies to ensure that the benefits can be more widely shared by our communities, and that people are not left behind in this process.
In these challenging times, we cannot simply leave it to governments to make the case for modern trade agreements. The 200-year-old lessons about free trade from David Ricardo are not widely embraced. Business wants more trade, but it also has a responsibility to help build broader support for it. There are plenty of protestors who want to tear down globalisation, but few champions who want to explain the benefits of economic integration. Business potentially can play this role very powerfully.
I’d like to leave you, then, with a call to action. Talk and listen to your businesspeople. We can help to shape the economic integration agenda in a constructive and positive way, and help to keep politicans’ feet to the gas pedal as far as possible. And please, also enlist the support of business not only to benefit from, but also to advocate for, trade liberalisation in your communities. We can be great cheerleaders if given the right encouragement!
REGISTER WITH TRADE WORKS
Register to stay up to date with latest news, as well as saving and discussing articles you’re interested in.
Latest News
SUBMISSION TO THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE ON A COMPREHENSIVE FREE TRADE AGREEMENT WITH INDIA
April 2025 Introduction This submission is being made on behalf of the New Zealand International Business Forum (NZIBF), whose members are listed at Annex A[1]. NZIBF is a group of senior business leaders working together to promote New Zealand’s engagement in the...
LAMENTATION DAY
When President Trump spoke in the White House Rose Garden to launch his wrecking-ball “fair and reciprocal tariffs”, there were some in the audience wearing hard hats. While this was doubtless to show support for the move amongst hard-working Americans, maybe...
BUSINESS FORUM DEEPLY DISAPPOINTED WITH UNJUSTIFIED US TARIFFS
Media release, 4 April 2025 The New Zealand International Business Forum (NZIBF) has reacted with deep disappointment to the news that the United States will implement an additional 10 percent ad valorem tariff on New Zealand exports. “The United States is a close and...
Bull in a China Shop: Market Price Support in the Dairy Industry
Market price support policies (aka as “subsidies”) in the agriculture sector are a classic example of what is meant by 'beggar thy neighbour'. One country attempts to improve its own economic situation by intervening in the market on behalf of its producers, at the...
BUSINESS FORUM WELCOMES INDIA FTA NEGOTIATIONS
Media release, 17 March 2025 The NZ International Business Forum (NZIBF) welcomes the launch of free trade negotiations with India, announced in Delhi, and is particularly pleased that these will proceed on a comprehensive basis. “There is enormous value to be gained...
Playing the long trade game with India
Prime Minister Luxon is at last making his visit to India with a large business and community delegation. We wish them well in expanding and deepening the relationship with India. The reasons for doing so we have explained previously. Our Government’s...
SUBMISSION TO THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE
PROPOSED GREEN ECONOMY JOINT WORKING GROUP WITH CHILE AND SINGAPORE MARCH 2025 Introduction This submission is made on behalf of the New Zealand International Business Forum (NZIBF), whose members are listed at Annex A[1]. NZIBF is a forum of senior business leaders...
PRESENTATION TO APEC BUSINESS ADVISORY COUNCIL: ADDRESSING PROTECTIONISM AND NON TARIFF BARRIERS
BRISBANE, 24 FEBRUARY 2025 STEPHEN JACOBI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NZIBF My thanks to Anna Curzon and Stephanie Honey for giving me one last opportunity to speak to ABAC. I want to talk today about rising protectionism and proliferating non tariff barriers. It’s not a new...
Business Leaders Sound Alarm on Global Economic Uncertainty: Call for Unified APEC Action
Brisbane, Australia, 25 February 2025 - Among rising global economic tension, the APEC Business Advisory Council met in Brisbane this week to reaffirm its support for the value of trade and cooperation, and the original APEC commitment to free, fair, open and...
REMARKS TO FOREIGN AFFAIRS, DEFENCE AND TRADE COMMITTEE – 20 FEBRUARY 2025
RATIFICATION OF NEW ZEALAND-UAE COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (CEPA) STEPHEN JACOBI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NZIBF Thank you Chair for the opportunity to appear before the Committee today. I do so on behalf of the members of the NZ International Business...
Submission by ExportNZ and TradeWorks to the Health Select Committee on the Gene Technology Bill
17th February 2025 Our Recommendations ExportNZ and the New Zealand International Business Forum (NZIBF) support the Government’s overall intention to modernise New Zealand’s gene technology regulations. We support the establishment of a risk-based regulatory regime...
SUBMISSION TO THE FOREIGN AFFAIRS, DEFENCE AND TRADE SELECT COMMITTEE
RATIFICATION OF NEW ZEALAND-UAE COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (CEPA) FEBRUARY 2025 This submission is made on behalf of the New Zealand International Business Forum (NZIBF) and ExportNZ[1]. NZIBF is a forum of senior business leaders working together...
SOUTHERN LINK REVISITED SEMINAR, SEPT 2024
On 24 September 2024 a stakeholders seminar was held in Auckland to reassess the Southern Link concept, five years after a large conference kickstarted focused discussion of the idea (before Covid intervened). This report of the seminar discussions...
T Day has come
STOP PRESS – NOT SO FAST. This post deals with the tariffs President Trump announced on 1 February he would impose on Canada, Mexico and China. By 4 February he announced imposition of tariffs on Canada and Mexico would be suspended for 30 days (until 5 March). ...
Back to the future?
The end of 2024 has trade advocates reaching back to their 2016 taking points as an Administration of a depressingly protectionist hue prepares to take office in the United States, once the global champion for trade liberalisation. We do not know for now what,...
0 Comments